Predetics

Post-Market Surveillance

Post-market surveillance for medical device software.

We help SaMD manufacturers design and document proportionate complaint, signal, vigilance, trend and lifecycle-review processes. The scope is advisory and documentation-focused unless operational responsibilities are expressly agreed.

Selected clients

Healthcare teams we have supported

Karl Storz Endoskope
Imagebytes PACS
J Mitra & Bros
Air Liquide
Magnus
NET
Leeford
Auxein
BLV Healthcare
Dr. Odin
ASCO
AIIMS
HEMC
Anondita Healthcare
Ribbel
Gibson
Client logo
Dentmark

Scope and deliverables

Post-market work included in the service.

Manufacturers retain legal reporting and decision responsibility. We can support assessment frameworks and records, but do not imply 24/7 surveillance, authorized-representative status or submission of reports unless specifically contracted and legally appropriate.

01

PMS framework and data map

Objectives, responsibilities, data sources, frequencies, quality checks, installed-base denominators and interfaces with risk, clinical, security and CAPA systems.

02

Complaint and event triage

Intake fields, duplicate handling, severity and causality prompts, investigation logic, reportability escalation and controlled decision records.

03

Signal and trend methods

Expected-event baselines, thresholds, stratification, data limitations, review cadence and escalation criteria proportionate to available volume.

04

Regulatory reporting support

Decision aids and documentation inputs for FDA MDR, EU vigilance and trend reporting, field actions and applicable Indian materiovigilance obligations.

05

Periodic reporting documentation

EU PMS report or PSUR structures, benefit-risk updates, sales and population estimates, CAPA summaries and PMCF interfaces where applicable.

06

Software lifecycle feedback

Link signals to risk files, cybersecurity monitoring, clinical evaluation, anomaly assessment, CAPA and regulatory change evaluation.

Ways to work together

Choose the support your team needs.

01

PMS system design

Create or remediate the process architecture, procedures, templates, roles and evidence flow.

02

Periodic report support

Structure and draft manufacturer-reviewed PMS, PSUR or lifecycle summaries from supplied and validated source data.

03

Focused event support

Help organize facts, risk and reportability analysis for a defined issue; legal deadlines and submissions remain clearly assigned.

How it works

Our process.

  1. 1

    Map obligations

    Identify products, markets, classes, reporting rules, roles and available data.

  2. 2

    Design controls

    Define intake, triage, signal, investigation, reporting and escalation workflows.

  3. 3

    Operationalize

    Create records, train assigned owners and test handoffs using realistic scenarios.

  4. 4

    Review and improve

    Assess outputs, reconcile trends and update risk, clinical, CAPA and product controls.

Regulations, standards and guidance considered

EU MDR Articles 83–92EU MDR Annex IIIFDA 21 CFR Part 803FDA 21 CFR Part 806ISO 13485:2016ISO 14971MDCG 2022-21Medical Devices Rules, 2017

Frequently asked questions

Questions teams ask before they begin.

What is the difference between PMS and vigilance?+

PMS is the systematic lifecycle process for collecting and evaluating experience from marketed devices. Vigilance is the subset of regulatory reporting and action for specified serious incidents, field safety corrective actions and related events. Exact terms and thresholds vary by jurisdiction.

Do all EU devices need a PSUR?+

No. Class I manufacturers prepare a PMS report and update it when necessary. Class IIa, IIb and III manufacturers prepare a PSUR, with update and availability or submission obligations that differ by class and device situation.

Does EUDAMED now receive every EU vigilance report?+

Not yet by default. The vigilance/PMS module has its own functionality notice and transition date. Until mandatory use applies, manufacturers follow the relevant national reporting processes and current Commission guidance.

Can automated analytics decide reportability?+

Automation can flag records and support consistency, but reportability depends on facts, definitions, causality, outcomes and jurisdiction-specific rules. Qualified review and documented decisions remain necessary.

Will Predetics monitor our product continuously or file reports for us?+

Not unless a specific lawful operational scope, coverage model and responsibilities are agreed. Our standard capability is system design, assessment support and documentation; the manufacturer retains deadline tracking, authority accounts and legal accountability.

Can PMS prevent all incidents or recalls?+

No. PMS improves detection and response but cannot eliminate product risk or guarantee that field action will never be needed. Conservative escalation and timely corrective action are part of an effective system.

Start with the product you have

Show us the software, the evidence and the deadline.

Talk to a specialist